Method Article

Ultrafast Doppler Vascular Imaging for Intraoperative Physiological Monitoring of Human Spinal Cord

DOI:

10.3791/68260

August 29th, 2025

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study presents the application of ultrafast Doppler vascular imaging for physiological monitoring during human spinal cord surgery.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Monitoring physiological parameters is essential for assessing the patient's condition during intraoperative scenarios. Hemodynamic information, such as blood pressure and heart rate, can be derived from ultrasound Doppler signals, reflecting vascular function and indicating pathological risks in real-time. Compared to oscillometry, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), conventional Doppler, and piezoelectric methods, ultrafast Doppler provides superior temporal resolution and high sensitivity for small vessels. In this study, an intraoperative application of ultrafast Doppler imaging in the spinal cord of a patient with Chiari malformation is described. Post-processing of the data generated power Doppler images of the spinal cord vasculature and physiological parameters, including detailed mapping of the resistivity index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI). Both RI and PI showed significant reductions after surgical intervention (RI mean: 0.47 → 0.32; PI mean: 0.63 → 0.39; p < 0.001), with consistent trends observed in the medians, indicating improved spinal cord hemodynamics. Evaluation of changes in PI/RI parameters using this method may offer a broader understanding of disease progression and treatment efficacy, potentially guiding surgical strategies and therapeutic approaches.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Blood pressure dynamics, as an important intraoperative physiological indicator, provides valuable guidance for surgical strategy and ensures operational safety1. Pulse waves, generated by the periodic contraction and relaxation of the heart, propagate through the arterial vascular system from the aorta as pressure waves2. These waves can be regarded as a direct manifestation of cardiovascular function, offering critical information for understanding blood pressure dynamics and overall hemodynamics3. In clinical practice, pulse waves are extensively utilized for continuous assessment of hemodynamic status4.

As a relay station and reflex center within the central nervous system, the spinal cord plays a pivotal role in transmitting motor and sensory information. The stability of its blood supply is crucial for maintaining and restoring neurological function6. The spinal cord pulsatile blood flow signal is closely associated with the pulse wave, containing information about vascular elasticity and hemodynamics, thereby reflecting the physiological and pathological changes of the spinal cord. Monitoring these signals faces considerable challenges due to the spinal cord’s small size, intricate vascular architecture7, and complex blood flow patterns8,  which complicate effective assessment of spinal cord pulse waves.

Several techniques for assessing pulse waves have been proposed. The oscillometric analysis method is easy to operate and provides rapid measurements. However, the accuracy of the results may be influenced by factors such as artifacts, patient posture, and the appropriate size and placement of the cuff9,10. Some piezoelectric biosignal sensors, such as piezoelectric pulse sensors, can efficiently detect pulse waves, yet their accuracy may be compromised by mechanical vibrations or temperature fluctuations; meanwhile, optical sensors such as photoplethysmography (PPG) are susceptible to environmental light and motion artifacts11. Furthermore, these techniques can only capture localized pulse wave signals and lack the ability to provide imaging information of the observed structure simultaneously12.

As a powerful imaging modality, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers relatively high spatial resolution measurement of the spinal cord's arterial walls, but it is costly and has limited accessibility13. Computed tomography (CT) imaging provides faster scan times and broader availability but emits ionizing radiation, which restricts its use for repeated assessments14. Conventional Doppler ultrasound enables real-time assessment of blood flow dynamics through two complementary imaging modes: color Doppler and pulse wave Doppler (PWD). Color Doppler provides a qualitative overview of flow velocities across the field of view by scanning the medium line-by-line, but suffers from low frame rates and poor sensitivity to slow or deep flows. PWD offers quantitative temporal information about blood flow waveforms, but is limited to a single, user-defined region of interest. As a result, it is applicable for strong hemodynamics in arteries and veins and quantifies instantaneous pulse waveforms within a small field of view15. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves the visualization of blood flow through the use of microbubble agents; however, the requirement for contrast injection raises safety concerns in intraoperative settings, rendering it less suitable for real-time assessment of vascular pulsatility16. Photoacoustic and optical imaging techniques provide high contrast and spatial resolution for vascular imaging, particularly in superficial tissues. However, their strong dependence on optical access significantly limits their applicability to deep-seated structures such as the spinal cord17.

In recent years, ultrafast ultrasound has advanced rapidly with great potential in vascular imaging18. Unlike traditional focused beam scanning, ultrafast Doppler uses multi-angle compounded plane wave techniques, which enhance ultrasound imaging sensitivity by about 50-fold and highly improve the detection of small vessels15,19,20. A complete Doppler spectrum can be obtained for each pixel in the image, facilitating the acquisition of comprehensive information on blood flow velocity and direction21. This can be used to estimate vascular indices such as resistivity index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) throughout the imaging area. Notably, in 2014, Demene et al.22 applied ultrafast Doppler technology to neonatal cerebral blood flow imaging, presenting a detailed distribution map of cerebral vascular RI in neonates. This advancement provides a new tool for understanding the mechanisms of cerebral blood flow autoregulation and the pathogenesis of related diseases in preterm and term infants. In 2020, Bourquin et al.23,24 proposed dynamic ultrasound localization microscopy (DULM) based on ultrafast ultrasound technology to achieve in vivo measurements of pulsatile microcirculation in the rodent brain and extended this technique to three-dimensional imaging, offering a new dimension for quantitative analysis.

Towards vascular imaging of the spinal cord, in 2021, Zang et al.25 achieved spinal cord microvascular imaging without contrast agents using ultrafast Doppler, with an imaging resolution comparable to the transmitted wavelength. Sui et al.26. employed a random sampling method based on robust principal component analysis (RPCA) to achieve fast, high signal-to-noise ratio ultrafast Doppler imaging of microcirculation in the brain and spinal cord. Pezet et al.27 observed vascular reconstruction following chronic spinal cord injury. In 2022, Yu et al.28 achieved ultrafast super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy of spinal cord microcirculation in rats based on RPCA, with imaging resolution reaching 13-16 µm, significantly smaller than the 100 µm wavelength. Further studies involved continuous observation and quantitative analysis of microcirculation in the spinal cord penumbra following spinal cord injury29. In 2023, Yan et al.30 utilized ultrafast ultrasound vector Doppler to perform vectorized imaging of small-vessel blood flow in human spinal cord tumors and assessed sequence-related safety in detail based on experimental sequence parameters. In 2024, Agyeman et al.31 conducted the first functional ultrasound imaging of the spinal cord in humans, which demonstrated the integration of spinal cord functional responses to electrical stimulation. Khaing et al.32 validated the correlation between perfusion imaging indicators and injury severity in both rats and humans following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. However, the detection and analysis of hemodynamic indices in spinal cord pulse waves still require further investigation.

Chiari malformation represents a significant and prevalent disorder impacting the spinal cord. It induces dynamic alterations in cerebrospinal fluid and spinal cord compression, disrupting spinal cord blood flow and vascular regulation, which may result in abnormal venous drainage33, increased vascular resistance34, and potential spinal cord ischemia35. Observation of spinal cord pulse waves facilitates a deeper understanding of spinal cord hemodynamic changes, offering valuable insights for diagnosing and treating Chiari malformation and other spinal cord disorders36.

This study presents a comprehensive protocol for utilizing ultrafast Doppler vascular imaging to intraoperatively monitor spinal cord physiological parameters in humans, with a specific focus on its application in a patient with Chiari malformation. This method enables real-time acquisition of high-frame-rate ultrafast Doppler data during exposure of the spinal cord, followed by post-processing to generate pixel-wise maps of RI and PI.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study involved human subjects, and all procedures were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, Huashan Hospital affiliated with Fudan University (2021-065). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The implementation was solely intended for preliminary research and validation purposes, not for clinical diagnosis. Relevant FDA-recommended safety indices were assessed to ensure compliance with established safety standards. Patients included in this study were diagnosed with Chiari malformation. The inclusion, exclusion, and withdrawal criteria for participants are provided in Supplementary File 1. The reagents and equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Instrument preparation

  1. Prepare the ultrasound imaging system.
    1. Connect the 128-channel linear array to the programmable ultrasound system.
      NOTE: Protect the ultrasound probe using a custom-designed housing, modeled with 3D software and fabricated by 3D printing. The probe used in this study was a miniaturized customized version rather than a commercial version. The ultrasound system platform employed in this study has previously been applied in several studies for the investigation of human vascular imaging37,38,39,40.
    2. Set the center frequency of the transducer to 15.625 MHz, corresponding to 100 µm spatial resolution.
    3. Ensure the pitch between adjacent elements is configured as 0.1 mm.
  2. Calibrate the device, test the code, and ensure that the system is operating correctly.
  3. Set up a platform for stable imaging.
    1. Position the robotic arm beside the surgical bed and lock it securely in place for subsequent probe fixation.
    2. Ensure that the probe remains fixed throughout the imaging session.
      NOTE: This setup minimizes shaking and positional shifts caused by manual operation, improving the stability and consistency of probe positioning during imaging.

2. Ultrasound sequence preparation

  1. Set an appropriate imaging depth according to the B-mode ultrasound imaging.
  2. Set the compounded frame rate to 1000 Hz.
  3. Set the acquisition time to 0.4 s.
  4. Transmit 11 tilted plane waves uniformly spaced between -10° and +10°, with a pulse repetition frequency of 11,000 Hz.
    NOTE: Tilted plane waves are emitted at various angles relative to the probe's lateral axis. In this study, 11 plane waves were evenly distributed from -10° to +10°.

3. Probe positioning

  1. Cover the ultrasound probe with a sterile protective bag for medical instruments (Figure 1A).
    1. Apply a generous amount of ultrasound gel inside the sterile bag.
    2. Insert the probe into the bag.
    3. Secure the probe inside the bag with a rubber band.
      NOTE: Acoustic coupling was achieved by applying sterile ultrasound gel to the inner surface of the sterile bag, which enclosed the probe. The bag itself was placed directly in contact with human tissue, allowing effective ultrasound transmission without direct contact between the coupling medium and the tissue.
  2. Secure the probe with the robotic arm (Figure 1B).
    1. Position the probe precisely on the exposed surface of the spinal cord following laminectomy.
    2. Stabilize the probe using the robotic arm to maintain consistent positioning during imaging.
      NOTE: The pneumatic robotic arm was used to stabilize the ultrasound probe. Although it lacks automatic scanning capabilities, the arm enables precise manual positioning and stability throughout the data acquisition process. The arm, equipped in the operating room, was manually controlled and fixed by the primary surgeon. At first, all major joints were secured, followed by fine adjustment of the terminal joint that holds the probe under B-mode ultrasound guidance.

4. Data acquisition

  1. Set an appropriate imaging depth according to the B-mode ultrasound imaging.
  2. Use real-time B-mode ultrasound imaging to identify the appropriate imaging plane.
  3. Locate the herniated cerebellar tonsils and spinal cord.
    NOTE: Confirm proper alignment when both the spinal cord and the cerebellar tonsils are clearly visualized within the same imaging plane, with distinguishable boundaries and appropriate anatomical orientation. In the B‑mode imaging plane, ensure that the cerebellar tonsils appear superior to the spinal cord, and that the dorsal margin of the cord is clearly defined with left–right symmetry. After confirming the correct imaging plane, acquire a single ultrafast Doppler image to verify the presence and stability of blood flow signals.
  4. Terminate the B-mode sequence and initiate the ultrafast sequence for data acquisition.
    NOTE: Perform the procedure under normal room temperature conditions. The imaging duration is short, and the probe did not exhibit any noticeable temperature increase during acquisition. This method provides a clear visualization of spinal cord structures during surgery, allowing for precise probe adjustments to achieve optimal vascular imaging, and enables comparison with preoperative MRI images. In the case presented in this study, the original imaging depth range was 0.5 to 9.5 mm. The actual imaging depth was held constant across all panels.

5. Analysis of spinal cord pulsatile blood flow signal before therapy (Figure 2)

  1. Generate power Doppler images of spinal cord vasculature. (Figure 3)
    NOTE: Probe stability was evaluated through power Doppler imaging analysis. The consistent visualization of spatially distinct vessels devoid of smearing artifacts demonstrates the efficacy of the robotic arm in preserving a stable acoustic window during acquisition.
    1. Perform beamforming on the acquired radiofrequency data.
    2. Apply the singular value decomposition (SVD)-based spatiotemporal filtering method to separate tissue signals from blood flow signals and remove high-frequency noise. Set appropriate thresholds to extract the desired blood flow components.
      ​NOTE: The ultrasound image signal comprises components of soft tissue, blood flow, and random noise. SVD-based spatiotemporal filtering separates these components based on their spatiotemporal characteristics41. This method decomposes the ultrasound image data into singular vectors and their corresponding singular values. By setting a filtering threshold of the singular values, large singular values are associated with eigenvectors representing tissue components with strong spatiotemporal correlation, medium singular values correspond to dynamic blood flow signals, and small singular values mainly represent noise. In this study, the SVD thresholds were set to retain singular components 80-380 prior to electrocautery treatment and 50-380 after surgical intervention. This threshold was empirically determined based on prior experience (Supplementary Figure 7).
    3. Demodulate the filtered blood flow signal into in-phase/quadrature (IQ) complex signals Mathematical expression of M(x,z,t) in static equilibrium diagram, highlighting variable dependence.. Compute the mean signal intensity at each pixel to obtain the power Doppler image PW (x,z(Equation 1)15. Nt is the number of frames acquired.
      Power-weight equation ΣNt; diagram; data analysis for scientific research; signal processing. (1)
      NOTE: Eligible Doppler data are characterized by clear vascular depiction and a high signal-to-noise ratio. If vascular visualization is suboptimal, revisit step 5.1.2 and adjust the SVD threshold range accordingly.
  2. Perform time-frequency analysis of the Doppler signal (Figure 4).
    1. Segment the blood flow signal using a short-time window (Figure 4A).
    2. Apply the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to estimate power spectral density at each pixel (Figure 4B).
      ​NOTE: The window length was chosen to sufficiently cover at least one cardiac cycle, ensuring that both systolic and diastolic frequency components could be reliably identified. A Hann window was used to reduce spectral leakage, and adjacent windows were overlapped to enhance temporal resolution. In this study, FFT was applied using a Hann window of length 80 with a 70% overlap.
    3. Slide the window continuously to obtain the time-varying mean Doppler frequency.
  3. Calculate RI and PI maps (Figure 4C and Figure 5A-D).
    1. Analyze the average Doppler frequency of blood flow signals over time at specific pixels (Figure 4C).
      NOTE: The validity of frequency analysis can be confirmed by observing periodic fluctuations in the average Doppler frequency that correspond to the cardiac cycle.
    2. Determine blood flow velocity and its variations to calculate RI (Equation 2)15 and PI (Equation 3)15. VPSV is peak systolic velocity, VEDV is end-diastolic velocity, and Vmean is the mean flow velocity.
      Resistance index equation, RI = (V_PSV - V_EDV) / V_PSV, used in hemodynamics research. (2)
      Pulsatility Index formula: PI=(V_PSV-V_EDV)/V_mean, used in hemodynamic studies. (3)
    3. Simplify the RI and PI calculation using Doppler frequency. Calculate RI (Equation 4) and PI (Equation 5) across the entire spinal cord. fmean(x,z,t) is the average Doppler frequency within a defined time window15.
      RI(x,z) formula for calculating relative importance in image analysis; mathematical equation. (4)
      Probability index formula; PI(x,z)=max-min/mean, equation for statistical data analysis. (5)
      NOTE: Due to blood flow, the ultrasound signal undergoes a frequency deviation known as Doppler shift, which is related to the blood flow velocity V (Equation 6). fDoppler represents the Doppler frequency shift, c0 denotes the speed of sound in human soft tissue, fpulse is the transmitted frequency of the ultrasound probe, and is the angle between the ultrasound beam and the direction of blood flow15.
      Doppler effect velocity formula, V=fDopplerc0/(2fpulsecostheta), equation representation. (6)
    4. The average Doppler frequency represents the mean value of the shift within a specific time window. Since V is proportional to the Doppler shift, it can be approximated by evaluating the average Doppler frequency at each pixel over time.
  4. Statistical analysis of RI and PI
    1. Use logical masks to extract valid RI and PI values from regions of interest, and exclude outliers using the interquartile range (IQR) method.
    2. Perform a weighted Student's t-test to evaluate differences between pre- and post-surgical conditions, accounting for the pixel-wise data structure.
      ​NOTE: Statistical analyses of RI and PI were conducted at the pixel level, and group differences were visualized using boxplots with significance levels indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

6. Patient management and safety of imaging protocols

  1. Monitor vital signs closely. Continuously monitor heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and body temperature during imaging. Ensure the patient's safety and comfort throughout the procedure.
    NOTE: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (such as somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials) is also conducted, considering nerve damage may occur during the surgery.
  2. Ensure appropriate probe pressure. Use the robotic arm to maintain stable and adequate pressure on the probe. Avoid excessive force that could damage the surface of the spinal cord.
  3. Maintain communication with the surgical team. Communicate clearly with the surgical team throughout the imaging process. Respond promptly to any patient discomfort or unexpected situations.

7. Acquisition and analysis of spinal cord pulsatile blood flow signal after therapy

  1. Repeat the steps described in step 5 to analyze the spinal cord blood flow signal after treatment.
    NOTE: After electrocautery treatment, the cerebellar tonsils retracted with reduced volume, blunted edges, and restored anatomical relationships with surrounding tissue structures (Figure 6). Data acquisition was performed at two distinct intraoperative time points: prior to electrocautery treatment and after surgical intervention. Currently, the exploration of RI and PI remains at a preliminary stage and has not been implemented for real-time surgical guidance. As a result, shortly after rapid data acquisition, the surgical procedure continued without significant interruption. Then, the collected data were processed offline (approximately 5-10 min,details of the processing steps and timing are provided in Supplementary File 2), ensuring no impact on the surgical workflow. In the future, if RI and PI can be used to assist intraoperative decision-making, they are expected to be integrated without disrupting the surgical timeline.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Ultrafast Doppler offers high sensitivity, enabling high temporal resolution imaging of the spinal cord vasculature network. Compared to color Doppler, power Doppler offers a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)42. An appropriate threshold range was used for the SVD-based spatiotemporal filter, enabling the identification of valid blood flow signals and the imaging of blood flow direction. Figure 3E,F presents the power Doppler images of the spinal cord...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In this study, ultrafast Doppler imaging was employed intraoperatively to extract the blood flow of the human spinal cord. Spectral analysis and calculation of the RI and PI were subsequently performed on the blood flow signals, providing power Doppler images of spinal cord vasculature and corresponding RI and PI maps of the patient with Chiari malformation. In the context of ultrafast ultrasound, small vessels refer to vessels with diameters on the order of 100 micrometers, while vessels smaller than 100 micrometers wer...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that they have no competing financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFC2410900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12274093), and the Shanghai International Science and Technology Cooperation Program (Grant No. 23490713500).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
MATLAB  R2022bMathWorksN/AFor post-processing of data
MicroscopeZEISSPENTERO 8O0 SFor intraoperative microscopic observation
Programmable ultrasound systemVerasonicsVantage 256For ultrasound imaging of spinal vessels
Robotic armAesculap RT060RFor fixing the probe
Single crystal high frequency linear array transducersVerasonicsL22-14vX For ultrasound imaging of spinal vessels
Ultrasound gelBaby FunType MEliminate the air gap between the probe and the contact surface

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Zucker, N., et al. Physio-fus: A tissue-motion based method for heart and breathing rate assessment in neurofunctional ultrasound imaging. EBioMedicine. 112, 105581(2025).
  2. Ghosh, A., et al. Impact of cardiovascular factors on pulse wave velocity and t otal vascular resistance in different age group patients with cardiovascular disorders. Curr Aging Sci. 11 (4), 261-268 (2019).
  3. Allen, J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 28 (3), R1-R39 (2007).
  4. Kouz, K., Scheeren, T. W. L., De Backer, D., Saugel, B. Pulse wave analysis to estimate cardiac output. Anesthesiology. 134 (1), 119-126 (2021).
  5. Hochman, S. Spinal cord. Curr Biol. 17 (22), R950-R955 (2007).
  6. Montalbano, M. J., Loukas, M., Oskouian, R. J., Tubbs, R. S. Innervation of the blood vessels of the spinal cord: A comprehensive review. Neurosurg Rev. 41 (3), 733-735 (2018).
  7. Soloukey, S., et al. Towards high-resolution functional ultrasound (fUS) imaging of the murine spinal cord. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). , 2259-2262 (2019).
  8. Stroman, P. W., et al. The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Methods. Neuroimage. 84, 1070-1081 (2014).
  9. Del Giorno, R., Troiani, C., Gabutti, S., Stefanelli, K., Gabutti, L. Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: A population-based study. Ann Med. 53 (1), 1-16 (2021).
  10. Bothe, T. L., et al. Impact of oscillometric measurement artefacts in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on estimates of average blood pressure and of its variability: A pilot study. J Hypertens. 41 (1), 140-149 (2023).
  11. Alqudah, A. M., et al. Multiple time and spectral analysis techniques for comparing the photoplethysmography to piezoelectric plethysmography with electrocardiography. Med Hypotheses. 143, 109870(2020).
  12. Zieff, G., et al. Pulse-wave velocity assessments derived from a simple photoplethysmography device: Agreement with a reference device. Front Cardiovasc Med. 10, 1108219(2023).
  13. Vargas, M. I., Boto, J., Meling, T. R. Imaging of the spine and spinal cord: An overview of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. Rev Neurol (Paris). 177 (5), 451-458 (2021).
  14. Shabani, S., Meyer, B. P., Budde, M. D., Wang, M. C. Diagnostic imaging in spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 32 (3), 323-331 (2021).
  15. Faure, F., et al. Quantification of brain-wide vascular resistivity via ultrafast Doppler in human neonates helps early detection of white matter injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 44 (9), 1577-1590 (2024).
  16. Hu, C., Feng, Y., Huang, P., Jin, J. Adverse reactions after the use of SonoVue contrast agent: Characteristics and nursing care experience. Medicine. 98 (44), e17745(2019).
  17. Han, S. H. Review of photoacoustic imaging for imaging-guided spinal surgery. Neurospine. 15 (4), 306-322 (2018).
  18. Van Den Bos-Van De Steeg, M. G. M., Fekkes, S., Saris, A., De Korte, C. L., Hansen, H. H. G. In vivo comparison of pulse wave velocity estimation based on ultrafast plane wave imaging and high-frame-rate focused transmissions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 48 (11), 2335-2343 (2022).
  19. Montaldo, G., Tanter, M., Bercoff, J., Benech, N., Fink, M. Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 56 (3), 489-506 (2009).
  20. Mace, E., et al. Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain: Theory and basic principles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 60 (3), 492-506 (2013).
  21. Bercoff, J., et al. Ultrafast compound Doppler imaging: Providing full blood flow characterization. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 58 (1), 134-147 (2011).
  22. Demené, C., et al. Ultrafast Doppler reveals the mapping of cerebral vascular resistivity in neonates. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 34 (6), 1009-1017 (2014).
  23. Bourquin, C., Poree, J., Lesage, F., Provost, J. In vivo pulsatility measurement of cerebral microcirculation in rodents using dynamic ultrasound localization microscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 41 (4), 782-792 (2022).
  24. Bourquin, C., et al. Quantitative pulsatility measurements using 3d dynamic ultrasound localization microscopy. Phys Med Biol. 69 (4), (2024).
  25. Zang, J. -Q., et al. Non-contrast-enhanced ultrafast ultrasound Doppler imaging of spinal cord micro-vessels. Acta Physica Sinica. 70 (11), (2021).
  26. Sui, Y., et al. Randomized spatial downsampling based robust PCA clutter filtering for ultrafast ultrasound imaging. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). , 1-4 (2021).
  27. Beliard, B., et al. Ultrafast Doppler imaging and ultrasound localization microscopy reveal the complexity of vascular rearrangement in chronic spinal lesions. Sci Rep. 12 (1), 6574(2022).
  28. Yu, J. -J., et al. Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy method for spinal cord mircovasculature imaging. Acta Physica Sinica. 71 (17), 174302(2022).
  29. Yu, J., Dong, H., Ta, D., Xie, R., Xu, K. Super-resolution ultrasound microvascular angiography for spinal cord penumbra imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 49 (9), 2140-2151 (2023).
  30. Yan, S., et al. Ultrafast ultrasound vector Doppler for small vasculature imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 70 (7), 613-624 (2023).
  31. Agyeman, K. A., et al. Functional ultrasound imaging of the human spinal cord. Neuron. 112 (10), 1710-1722 (2024).
  32. Khaing, Z. Z., et al. Perfusion imaging metrics after acute traumatic spinal cord injury are associated with injury severity in rats and humans. Sci Transl Med. 16 (765), eadn4970(2024).
  33. Williams, H. A unifying hypothesis for hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, syringomyelia, anencephaly, and spina bifida. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 5, 7(2008).
  34. Heiss, J. D. Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in Chiari I malformation and syringomyelia: Modeling pathophysiology. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 34 (1), 81-90 (2023).
  35. Pinna, G., Alessandrini, F., Alfieri, A., Rossi, M., Bricolo, A. Cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics study in Chiari I malformation: Implications for syrinx formation. Neurosurg Focus. 8 (3), E3(2000).
  36. Da Cunha, B. L. B., et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in Chiari I malformation surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 47 (1), 634(2024).
  37. Verhoef, L., et al. Freehand ultrafast Doppler ultrasound imaging with optical tracking allows for detailed 3d reconstruction of blood flow in the human brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. , (2025).
  38. Fakhari, N., et al. Longitudinal assessment of cerebral blood volume variation in human neonates using ultrafast power Doppler and diverging waves. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 42 (8), 2223-2234 (2023).
  39. Huang, L., et al. Improved ultrafast power Doppler imaging by using spatiotemporal Non-Local means filtering. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 69 (5), 1610-1624 (2022).
  40. Lok, U. W., et al. Ultrasound microvessel imaging of the human placenta demonstrates altered vessel densities in fetal growth restriction with vascular and immune pathologies: A pilot case-control study. J Ultrasound Med. 44 (2), 285-299 (2025).
  41. Desailly, Y., et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound by real-time spatiotemporal filtering of ultrafast images. Phys Med Biol. 62 (1), 31-42 (2017).
  42. Martinoli, C., et al. Power Doppler sonography: Clinical applications. Eur J Radiol. 27 Suppl2, S133-S140 (1998).
  43. Tanter, M., Fink, M. Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 61 (1), 102-119 (2014).
  44. Bonow, R. H., Young, C. C., Bass, D. I., Moore, A., Levitt, M. R. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in neurological surgery and neurocritical care. Neurosurg Focus. 47 (6), E2(2019).
  45. Wagshul, M. E., et al. The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility. Fluids Barriers CNS. 8 (1), 5(2011).
  46. Sun, Q., Fu, Y., Yan, S., Xu, K. 4-D vector Doppler imaging using row-column addressed array. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 72 (2), 202-214 (2025).
  47. Sun, Q., et al. Single crystal row-column array-based rat brain 3-D ultrasound localization microscopy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 72 (6), 698-708 (2025).
  48. Posada, D., et al. Staggered multiple-prf ultrafast color Doppler. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 35 (6), 1510-1521 (2016).
  49. Poree, J., et al. Dealiasing high-frame-rate color Doppler using dual-wavelength processing. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 68 (6), 2117-2128 (2021).
  50. Tuccio, G., Afrakhteh, S., Iacca, G., Demi, L. Time-efficient ultrasound localization microscopy based on a novel radial basis function 2d interpolation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 43 (5), 1690-1701 (2024).
  51. Afrakhteh, S., Mento, F., Demi, L. Application of tensor completion for reducing the beamforming time in ultrafast ultrasound imaging: A Doppler ultrasound assessment. IEEE Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Joint Symp (UFFC-JS). , 1-4 (2024).
  52. Afrakhteh, S., Iacca, G., Demi, L. A two-dimensional angular interpolation based on radial basis functions for high frame rate ultrafast imaging. J Acoust Soc Am. 154 (5), 3454-3465 (2023).
  53. Denarie, B., et al. Coherent plane wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography of rapidly moving targets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 32 (7), 1265-1276 (2013).
  54. Poree, J., et al. High-frame-rate echocardiography using coherent compounding with Doppler-based motion-compensation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 35 (7), 1647-1657 (2016).
  55. Hingot, V., Errico, C., Tanter, M., Couture, O. Subwavelength motion-correction for ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy. Ultrasonics. 77, 17-21 (2017).
  56. Harput, S., et al. Two-stage motion correction for super-resolution ultrasound imaging in the human lower limb. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 65 (5), 803-814 (2018).
  57. Yu, J., Cai, Y., Zeng, Z., Xu, K. Voxelmorph-based deep learning motion correction for ultrasound localization microscopy of spinal cord. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. , 1752-1764 (2024).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Ultrafast DopplerVascular ImagingSpinal Cord MonitoringIntraoperative MonitoringPower Doppler ImagingHemodynamic AssessmentResistivity IndexPulsatility IndexSpinal Cord HemodynamicsChiari Malformation
Video Coming Soon

Related Articles